Skip to content
TrueEloPlay what wins.
Score a position

Philidor Defense

37 variations · 46M games from Lichess · Updated January 2026

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
h8
g
f
e
d
c
b
a
3...Be7
Analyze this line move by move

Black expected score · Overall

47.7%

40%55%
Floor47.7%

the worst score you would still get, 90% confident. Its best is the same figure — the band is too tight to plot.

Measured over 46M games at this level and clock.

Tough Sellloses more often than it wins at this level

Black comes out behind here — there are better weapons in the ranked list.

Outcomes for Black

Draw 4.1 · Score = win + ½ of the draws · 46M games

Rank among the families Black can choose here
#36 of 62
Games in this context
46M
Best context
54.4% at 0-999 UltraBullet
Worst context
38.7% at 2000-2199 Classical
Variations measured
37
Average game length
34 moves

Best and worst are the strongest and weakest squares with at least 500 games behind them. The table further down shows every square, including thinner ones.

What to play from here

Black · Overall

These are the moves players actually choose from here, ranked by how they score. A higher score is a better bet on the numbers alone — familiarity and playstyle still matter.

Where it holds · Black score by rating × clock

Green is clearly ahead for Black, grey is around even, red is behind. Tap a cell to measure there, and again to clear. It falls away as the rating rises: 49.5% at 0-999, 39.1% at 2500+.

RatingUBBulleBlitzRapidClass
0-999
1000-1199
1200-1399
1400-1599
1600-1799
1800-1999
2000-2199
2200-2499
2500+

Expected score matrix by rating bracket and time control

  • 0-999 rating, UltraBullet: 54.4% expected score (3,630 games)
  • 0-999 rating, Bullet: 50.0% expected score (657,166 games)
  • 0-999 rating, Blitz: 48.0% expected score (1,593,534 games)
  • 0-999 rating, Rapid: 47.0% expected score (742,144 games)
  • 0-999 rating, Classical: 48.3% expected score (6,017 games)
  • 1000-1199 rating, UltraBullet: 53.1% expected score (8,870 games)
  • 1000-1199 rating, Bullet: 49.0% expected score (1,228,858 games)
  • 1000-1199 rating, Blitz: 47.4% expected score (3,042,515 games)
  • 1000-1199 rating, Rapid: 45.8% expected score (1,194,056 games)
  • 1000-1199 rating, Classical: 45.5% expected score (24,939 games)
  • 1200-1399 rating, UltraBullet: 51.4% expected score (19,621 games)
  • 1200-1399 rating, Bullet: 49.2% expected score (1,795,329 games)
  • 1200-1399 rating, Blitz: 47.8% expected score (4,780,024 games)
  • 1200-1399 rating, Rapid: 46.6% expected score (1,939,201 games)
  • 1200-1399 rating, Classical: 45.2% expected score (65,663 games)
  • 1400-1599 rating, UltraBullet: 48.6% expected score (17,163 games)
  • 1400-1599 rating, Bullet: 49.2% expected score (2,106,471 games)
  • 1400-1599 rating, Blitz: 47.8% expected score (5,849,810 games)
  • 1400-1599 rating, Rapid: 47.2% expected score (2,454,702 games)
  • 1400-1599 rating, Classical: 46.2% expected score (134,925 games)
  • 1600-1799 rating, UltraBullet: 44.5% expected score (8,497 games)
  • 1600-1799 rating, Bullet: 49.2% expected score (1,974,624 games)
  • 1600-1799 rating, Blitz: 47.6% expected score (5,353,353 games)
  • 1600-1799 rating, Rapid: 46.8% expected score (2,149,167 games)
  • 1600-1799 rating, Classical: 44.2% expected score (111,774 games)
  • 1800-1999 rating, UltraBullet: 46.2% expected score (4,963 games)
  • 1800-1999 rating, Bullet: 49.1% expected score (1,502,786 games)
  • 1800-1999 rating, Blitz: 47.2% expected score (3,246,216 games)
  • 1800-1999 rating, Rapid: 46.0% expected score (1,190,273 games)
  • 1800-1999 rating, Classical: 42.4% expected score (38,985 games)
  • 2000-2199 rating, UltraBullet: 44.0% expected score (2,855 games)
  • 2000-2199 rating, Bullet: 49.0% expected score (833,918 games)
  • 2000-2199 rating, Blitz: 46.6% expected score (1,098,809 games)
  • 2000-2199 rating, Rapid: 43.9% expected score (282,804 games)
  • 2000-2199 rating, Classical: 38.7% expected score (5,026 games)
  • 2200-2499 rating, UltraBullet: 43.1% expected score (1,382 games)
  • 2200-2499 rating, Bullet: 48.7% expected score (402,750 games)
  • 2200-2499 rating, Blitz: 45.9% expected score (275,958 games)
  • 2200-2499 rating, Rapid: 42.4% expected score (34,769 games)
  • 2200-2499 rating, Classical: 39.2% expected score (451 games)
  • 2500+ rating, UltraBullet: 40.9% expected score (125 games)
  • 2500+ rating, Bullet: 47.2% expected score (95,017 games)
  • 2500+ rating, Blitz: 44.5% expected score (34,559 games)
  • 2500+ rating, Rapid: 38.8% expected score (1,235 games)
  • 2500+ rating, Classical: 24.2% expected score (70 games)

37 variations · ranked by floor

Floor — the worst score you would still get, 90% confident.

1
Philidor Defense: Philidor Countergambit, Berger Variation133 games
63.4%Floor 56.5%
2
Philidor Defense: Lion Variation, Sozin Variation425 games
58.2%Floor 54.3%
3
Philidor Defense: Lion Variation, Bishop Sacrifice16K games
54.0%Floor 53.4%
Philidor Defense: Albin-Blackburne Gambit36K games
53.5%Floor 53.1%
Philidor Defense: Lion Variation751K games
51.9%Floor 51.9%
Philidor Defense: Hanham Variation, Steiner Variation9.9K games
52.4%Floor 51.5%
Philidor Defense: Lion Variation, Lion's Claw, with Be2 and c610.0K games
51.8%Floor 51.0%
Philidor Defense: Hanham Variation750K games
51.1%Floor 51.0%
Philidor Defense: Hanham Variation, Schlechter Variation54K games
51.1%Floor 50.8%
Philidor Defense: Hanham Variation, Krause Variation19K games
51.3%Floor 50.7%
Philidor Defense: Lion Variation, Lion's Claw, with Bc4 and h625K games
51.2%Floor 50.7%
Philidor Defense: Berger Variation161 games
55.3%Floor 48.8%
Philidor Defense: Steinitz Variation433K games
48.6%Floor 48.5%
Philidor Defense: Philidor Countergambit276K games
48.6%Floor 48.5%
Philidor Defense: Philidor Countergambit, del Rio Attack9.7K games
49.1%Floor 48.3%
Philidor Defense: Boden Variation34K games
48.5%Floor 48.1%
Philidor Defense: Lopez Countergambit547K games
48.0%Floor 47.9%
Philidor Defense35M games
47.7%Floor 47.7%
Philidor Defense: Hanham Variation, Delmar Variation19K games
48.2%Floor 47.6%
Philidor Defense: Exchange Variation6.1M games
47.4%Floor 47.3%
Philidor Defense: Larsen Variation162K games
46.9%Floor 46.7%
Philidor Defense: Morphy Gambit579K games
46.6%Floor 46.5%
Philidor Defense: Nimzowitsch, Larobok Variation207 games
52.0%Floor 46.3%
Philidor Defense: Hanham, Kmoch Variation8.2K games
47.0%Floor 46.1%
Philidor Defense: Nimzowitsch, Locock Variation9.8K games
46.5%Floor 45.7%
Philidor Defense: Nimzowitsch Variation, Klein Variation273K games
45.5%Floor 45.4%
Philidor Defense: Philidor Gambit41K games
45.4%Floor 45.0%
Philidor Defense: Bird Gambit311K games
45.0%Floor 44.8%
Philidor Defense: Nimzowitsch Variation, Rellstab Variation12K games
45.4%Floor 44.7%
Philidor Defense: Nimzowitsch Variation, Sokolsky Variation1.9K games
46.3%Floor 44.5%
Philidor Defense: Nimzowitsch Variation722K games
44.4%Floor 44.3%
Philidor Defense: Lion Variation, Shirov Gambit15K games
44.7%Floor 44.1%
Philidor Defense: Philidor Countergambit, Zukertort Variation124K games
44.1%Floor 43.9%
Philidor Defense: Hanham Variation, Sharp Variation3.1K games
45.3%Floor 43.8%
Philidor Defense: Lion Variation, Forcing Line3.9K games
42.3%Floor 41.0%
Philidor Defense: Lion Variation, Delayed Bishop Sacrifice6.6K games
41.5%Floor 40.5%
Philidor Defense: Paulsen Attack15K games
40.9%Floor 40.2%
Analyze Philidor Defense PositionsSee what each move is worth at your rating, move by move

Methodology

Across every rating and clock, the Philidor Defense family scores 47.7% for Black — we are 90% confident it is 47.7% — from 46M Lichess games across 37 variations. Win rate, draw rate and loss rate come from games played December 2023 to November 2025.

How the figures are made
Whose games these are
46M+ rated games played on Lichess (2023-12 to 2025-11). The games are Lichess’s and free for anyone to use. What is ours is the reading of them. Last rebuilt January 2026.
Which games we count
  • Rated games only — nothing casual.
  • Both players within 200 rating points of each other. A mismatch tells you about the gap, not about the opening.
  • At least 2 moves played.
  • A game is filed under White’s rating.
Why every number comes with a range
A number off a few hundred games is a guess. The same number off millions is a fact. The range is what tells them apart, and it is what the lists rank on — so an opening cannot reach the top on a lucky run of forty games. The more games behind a figure, the narrower its range.
How much we need before we say anything
An opening page needs 100 games. A gambit needs 50 games at a rating before we will say whether it pays there. The chaos and trap lists need 500 games overall and 250 games at one rating or clock.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Philidor Defense win rate?

Across the Philidor Defense's 37 variations, Black wins 45.6%, draws 4.1% and loses 50.2%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 47.7%. It rests on 46M rated games from Lichess.

How many Philidor Defense variations are there?

37 Philidor Defense variations have a page of their own, each broken down by rating and by clock.

At what rating does the Philidor Defense perform best?

The Philidor Defense family performs best for Black at 0-999, with an Expected Score of 48.2% (3.0M games) and the highest Floor of any rating with enough games to read. Performance may vary by specific variation.

Is the Philidor Defense better in blitz or rapid?

For Black, the Philidor Defense scores higher in Blitz: an Expected Score of 47.6% in Blitz (25M games) against 46.6% in Rapid (10.0M games).

How sharp is the Philidor Defense?

Philidor Defense games are 95.9% decisive (non-draws), with an average length of 34 moves. Sharpness varies by specific variation.

Is the Philidor Defense a good opening family?

The Philidor Defense family is hard work for Black — it favours White overall. Across its games, Black wins 45.6% and loses 50.2%. Results differ between its 37 variations, so open the one you play for its own figures.