Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit
100K games from Lichess · Updated January 2026
Black expected score · All ratings · All speeds
50.4%
the worst score you would still get, 90% confident. At best 50.7%.
Measured over 100K games at this level and clock.
Roughly even — the middlegame decides more than this opening choice does.
Outcomes for Black
Draw 3.8 · Score = win + ½ of the draws · 100K games
- Rank among the families Black can choose here
- not ranked — this is a variation, not a family
- Games in this context
- 100K
- Best context
- 53.9% at 1800-1999 Rapid
- Worst context
- 42.5% at 1000-1199 Rapid
- Average game length
- 33 moves
- Games that end decisively
- 96.2%
- Draws
- 3.8%
Best and worst are the strongest and weakest squares with at least 500 games behind them. The table further down shows every square, including thinner ones.
Extra Analysis
Deep-dive datasets for this opening
Where it holds · Black score by rating × clock
Green is clearly ahead for Black, grey is around even, red is behind. Tap a cell to measure there, and again to clear. It falls away as the rating rises: 48.7% at 0-999, 41.5% at 2500+.
| Rating | UB | Bulle | Blitz | Rapid | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-999 | |||||
| 1000-1199 | |||||
| 1200-1399 | |||||
| 1400-1599 | |||||
| 1600-1799 | |||||
| 1800-1999 | |||||
| 2000-2199 | |||||
| 2200-2499 | |||||
| 2500+ |
Expected score matrix by rating bracket and time control
- 0-999 rating, UltraBullet: 78.6% expected score (2 games)
- 0-999 rating, Bullet: 48.3% expected score (397 games)
- 0-999 rating, Blitz: 48.6% expected score (701 games)
- 0-999 rating, Rapid: 38.2% expected score (226 games)
- 0-999 rating, Classical: 30.0% expected score (1 games)
- 1000-1199 rating, UltraBullet: 54.7% expected score (20 games)
- 1000-1199 rating, Bullet: 45.9% expected score (887 games)
- 1000-1199 rating, Blitz: 44.9% expected score (1,329 games)
- 1000-1199 rating, Rapid: 42.5% expected score (518 games)
- 1000-1199 rating, Classical: 13.7% expected score (4 games)
- 1200-1399 rating, UltraBullet: 44.1% expected score (41 games)
- 1200-1399 rating, Bullet: 50.2% expected score (1,829 games)
- 1200-1399 rating, Blitz: 43.6% expected score (2,174 games)
- 1200-1399 rating, Rapid: 44.7% expected score (762 games)
- 1200-1399 rating, Classical: 40.9% expected score (15 games)
- 1400-1599 rating, UltraBullet: 48.9% expected score (173 games)
- 1400-1599 rating, Bullet: 51.5% expected score (3,722 games)
- 1400-1599 rating, Blitz: 47.6% expected score (4,039 games)
- 1400-1599 rating, Rapid: 48.0% expected score (1,039 games)
- 1400-1599 rating, Classical: 40.4% expected score (40 games)
- 1600-1799 rating, UltraBullet: 44.4% expected score (280 games)
- 1600-1799 rating, Bullet: 52.1% expected score (6,796 games)
- 1600-1799 rating, Blitz: 50.3% expected score (6,451 games)
- 1600-1799 rating, Rapid: 49.4% expected score (1,170 games)
- 1600-1799 rating, Classical: 57.0% expected score (99 games)
- 1800-1999 rating, UltraBullet: 38.4% expected score (76 games)
- 1800-1999 rating, Bullet: 50.8% expected score (10,876 games)
- 1800-1999 rating, Blitz: 52.0% expected score (12,191 games)
- 1800-1999 rating, Rapid: 53.9% expected score (1,561 games)
- 1800-1999 rating, Classical: 53.8% expected score (77 games)
- 2000-2199 rating, UltraBullet: 58.0% expected score (11 games)
- 2000-2199 rating, Bullet: 51.9% expected score (10,053 games)
- 2000-2199 rating, Blitz: 51.5% expected score (10,403 games)
- 2000-2199 rating, Rapid: 52.0% expected score (1,288 games)
- 2000-2199 rating, Classical: 54.1% expected score (23 games)
- 2200-2499 rating, UltraBullet: 73.1% expected score (5 games)
- 2200-2499 rating, Bullet: 50.3% expected score (10,950 games)
- 2200-2499 rating, Blitz: 51.4% expected score (5,813 games)
- 2200-2499 rating, Rapid: 47.4% expected score (318 games)
- 2200-2499 rating, Classical: 73.8% expected score (9 games)
- 2500+ rating, UltraBullet: 30.0% expected score (1 games)
- 2500+ rating, Bullet: 44.4% expected score (2,861 games)
- 2500+ rating, Blitz: 46.8% expected score (509 games)
- 2500+ rating, Rapid: 47.2% expected score (16 games)
- 2500+ rating, Classical: 38.9% expected score (3 games)
Related Openings
Methodology
Across every rating and clock, the Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit scores 50.4% for Black — we are 90% confident the real figure is between 50.1% and 50.7% — from 100K Lichess games. Win rate, draw rate and loss rate come from games played December 2023 to November 2025.
How the figures are made
- Whose games these are
- 100K+ rated games played on Lichess (2023-12 to 2025-11). The games are Lichess’s and free for anyone to use. What is ours is the reading of them. Last rebuilt January 2026.
- Which games we count
- Rated games only — nothing casual.
- Both players within 200 rating points of each other. A mismatch tells you about the gap, not about the opening.
- At least 2 moves played.
- A game is filed under White’s rating.
- Why every number comes with a range
- A number off a few hundred games is a guess. The same number off millions is a fact. The range is what tells them apart, and it is what the lists rank on — so an opening cannot reach the top on a lucky run of forty games. The more games behind a figure, the narrower its range.
- How much we need before we say anything
- An opening page needs 100 games. A gambit needs 50 games at a rating before we will say whether it pays there. The chaos and trap lists need 500 games overall and 250 games at one rating or clock.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit win rate?
Playing the Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit, Black wins 48.5%, draws 3.8% and loses 47.7%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 50.4%. It rests on 100K rated games from Lichess.
At what rating does the Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit perform best?
The Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit performs best for Black at 2000-2199, with an Expected Score of 51.7% (22K games) and the highest Floor of any rating with enough games to read.
Is the Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit better in blitz or rapid?
For Black, the Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit scores higher in Blitz: an Expected Score of 50.4% in Blitz (44K games) against 49.2% in Rapid (6.9K games).
How sharp is the Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit?
The Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit has a sharpness score of 96.2 (very decisive), meaning 96.2% of games end decisively. Average game length is 33 moves.
What is the Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit win rate at 0-999?
At 0-999, Black wins 45.4%, draws 2.7% and loses 51.9%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 46.8%. It rests on 1.3K Lichess games, which average 26 moves.
What is the Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit win rate at 1000-1199?
At 1000-1199, Black wins 43.4%, draws 2.7% and loses 53.9%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 44.8%. It rests on 2.8K Lichess games, which average 27 moves.
What is the Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit win rate at 1200-1399?
At 1200-1399, Black wins 45.0%, draws 2.5% and loses 52.5%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 46.3%. It rests on 4.8K Lichess games, which average 29 moves.
What is the Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit win rate at 1400-1599?
At 1400-1599, Black wins 47.9%, draws 2.7% and loses 49.4%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 49.3%. It rests on 9.0K Lichess games, which average 30 moves.
What is the Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit win rate at 1600-1799?
At 1600-1799, Black wins 49.6%, draws 2.7% and loses 47.7%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 51.0%. It rests on 15K Lichess games, which average 31 moves.
What is the Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit win rate at 1800-1999?
At 1800-1999, Black wins 49.8%, draws 3.5% and loses 46.7%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 51.6%. It rests on 25K Lichess games, which average 33 moves.
What is the Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit win rate at 2000-2199?
At 2000-2199, Black wins 49.6%, draws 4.1% and loses 46.2%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 51.7%. It rests on 22K Lichess games, which average 35 moves.
What is the Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit win rate at 2200-2499?
At 2200-2499, Black wins 48.0%, draws 5.2% and loses 46.8%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 50.6%. It rests on 17K Lichess games, which average 37 moves.
What is the Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit win rate at 2500+?
At 2500+, Black wins 40.4%, draws 8.7% and loses 50.9%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 44.8%. It rests on 3.4K Lichess games, which average 41 moves.
What is the Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit win rate in UltraBullet?
In UltraBullet, Black wins 45.5%, draws 0.7% and loses 53.8%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 45.9%. It rests on 609 Lichess games.
What is the Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit win rate in Bullet?
In Bullet, Black wins 49.1%, draws 3.0% and loses 47.9%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 50.6%. It rests on 48K Lichess games.
What is the Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit win rate in Blitz?
In Blitz, Black wins 48.1%, draws 4.5% and loses 47.4%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 50.4%. It rests on 44K Lichess games.
What is the Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit win rate in Rapid?
In Rapid, Black wins 46.6%, draws 5.1% and loses 48.3%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 49.2%. It rests on 6.9K Lichess games.
What is the Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit win rate in Classical?
In Classical, Black wins 47.2%, draws 9.4% and loses 43.5%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 51.9%. It rests on 271 Lichess games.
Is the Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit a good opening?
The Slav Defense: Winawer Countergambit is about level. Across all ratings, Black wins 48.5% of its games and loses 47.7%. It performs best at 2000-2199. Your results depend on your rating, time control, and how well you know the typical plans.