Queen's Gambit Declined: Baltic Defense, Queen Attack

White Gambit

Source Lichess

Play This+15%
All Ratings
Minimum Advantage+15.3%

White wins at least 15.3% more often than loses

Rating TrendPeak: +15.8% at 1800-1999
Win%56.4%
Games55K
Breakpoint (Overall)Never
3.Qb3
Queen's Gambit Declined: Baltic Defense, Queen AttackWhite Gambit
Rating
Time Control

Does Queen's Gambit Declined: Baltic Defense, Queen Attack work for White at All Ratings?

Snapshot

At All Ratings, Queen's Gambit Declined: Baltic Defense, Queen Attack gives White a +15.3% minimum advantage (90% confidence). This gambit is effective.

RatingMin AdvWhite WinDrawWhite LossGames
0-999+13.0%60.6%1.2%38.2%293
1000-1199+10.7%56.5%2.3%41.2%1.2K
1200-1399+12.1%56.3%2.2%41.5%3.4K
1400-1599+15.2%57.2%2.6%40.3%9.2K
1600-1799+15.4%56.8%3.0%40.2%18K
1800-1999+15.8%56.8%3.4%39.7%16K
2000-2199+11.1%54.5%4.2%41.3%6.1K
2200-2499+3.2%51.4%4.2%44.3%1.8K
2500++5.6%57.7%6.9%35.4%93
Full Opening StatsSee rating/time-control breakdowns for White on the opening stats page
Analyze Queen's Gambit Declined: Baltic Defense, Queen Attack PositionsGet move-by-move win rates with the TrueElo analyzer

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Queen's Gambit Declined: Baltic Defense, Queen Attack sound?

The Queen's Gambit Declined: Baltic Defense, Queen Attack has no overall breakpoint in Lichess data, meaning White wins more than loses even at the highest rating brackets across all time controls. This is a statistically sound gambit at all levels analyzed.

What is the Queen's Gambit Declined: Baltic Defense, Queen Attack win rate?

The Queen's Gambit Declined: Baltic Defense, Queen Attack has a 56.4% (90% CI: 56.1%-56.8%) win rate for White overall, with a 3.1% draw rate and 40.4% loss rate. This is based on 55K games from Lichess.

What is the best rating to play the Queen's Gambit Declined: Baltic Defense, Queen Attack?

The Queen's Gambit Declined: Baltic Defense, Queen Attack performs best at 1800-1999, where White has a minimum advantage of +15.8%. This means we're 90% confident White wins at least 15.8 percentage points more than they lose at this rating.

Is the Queen's Gambit Declined: Baltic Defense, Queen Attack better in blitz or rapid?

Rapid (+19.6% edge) outperforms Bullet (+11.3% edge) by 8.3 percentage points. Faster time controls typically favor gambits because opponents have less time to find accurate defenses.

Does the Queen's Gambit Declined: Baltic Defense, Queen Attack breakpoint vary by time control?

Yes, significantly. Breakpoints by time control: Bullet: 0-999, Blitz: Never, Rapid: 2200-2499, Classical: Never. "Never" means the gambit remains viable through all rating brackets in that time control. Faster time controls typically extend viability.

How sharp is the Queen's Gambit Declined: Baltic Defense, Queen Attack?

The Queen's Gambit Declined: Baltic Defense, Queen Attack is extremely sharp with only 3.1% draws—96.9% of games end decisively. This makes it an excellent choice when you need to play for a win rather than accept a draw.

Should I play the Queen's Gambit Declined: Baltic Defense, Queen Attack?

The Queen's Gambit Declined: Baltic Defense, Queen Attack is viable at all rating levels in Lichess data. White maintains a statistical edge throughout. It's an excellent choice if you enjoy sharp, initiative-based play.

How do I defend against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Baltic Defense, Queen Attack?

The Queen's Gambit Declined: Baltic Defense, Queen Attack is statistically challenging to defend at all levels. As Black, focus on quick development, early castling, and piece trades. Don't get greedy with extra material. Consider declining the gambit or finding a transposition if you're uncomfortable with sharp positions.

How reliable is the Queen's Gambit Declined: Baltic Defense, Queen Attack data?

This analysis is based on 55K games from Lichess. All statistics include 90% confidence intervals. Generally, 300+ games provide statistically meaningful results. Rating-specific and time-control-specific breakdowns have their own sample sizes shown in the table above.