Does Bishop's Opening: Urusov Gambit, Keidansky Gambit work for White at All Ratings?
Snapshot
At All Ratings, Bishop's Opening: Urusov Gambit, Keidansky Gambit gives White a +17.1% minimum advantage (90% confidence). This gambit is effective.
Bishop's Opening: Urusov Gambit, Keidansky Gambit
White GambitSource Lichess
View As
Play This+17%All Ratings
Minimum Advantage+17.1%
White wins at least 17.1% more often than loses
Rating TrendPeak: +22.6% at 2200-2499
Win%57.4%
Games68K
Breakpoint (Overall)Never
5.Qxd4
Bishop's Opening: Urusov Gambit, Keidansky GambitWhite Gambit
Rating
Time Control
| Rating | Min Adv | White Win | Draw | White Loss | Games |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-999 | +6.2% | 53.4% | 2.6% | 43.9% | 2.5K |
| 1000-1199 | +12.4% | 56.2% | 2.1% | 41.6% | 5.5K |
| 1200-1399 | +12.3% | 55.9% | 2.3% | 41.8% | 8.9K |
| 1400-1599 | +15.3% | 57.4% | 2.1% | 40.5% | 11K |
| 1600-1799 | +15.2% | 57.0% | 2.5% | 40.4% | 13K |
| 1800-1999 | +15.8% | 57.3% | 2.8% | 40.0% | 13K |
| 2000-2199 | +22.2% | 60.1% | 3.6% | 36.3% | 10K |
| 2200-2499 | +22.6% | 60.4% | 4.2% | 35.4% | 4.5K |
| 2500+ | +11.7% | 45.9% | 26.5% | 27.6% | 562 |
Full Opening StatsSee rating/time-control breakdowns for White on the opening stats page
Analyze Bishop's Opening: Urusov Gambit, Keidansky Gambit PositionsGet move-by-move win rates with the TrueElo analyzer
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bishop's Opening: Urusov Gambit, Keidansky Gambit sound?
The Bishop's Opening: Urusov Gambit, Keidansky Gambit has no overall breakpoint in Lichess data, meaning White wins more than loses even at the highest rating brackets across all time controls. This is a statistically sound gambit at all levels analyzed.
What is the Bishop's Opening: Urusov Gambit, Keidansky Gambit win rate?
The Bishop's Opening: Urusov Gambit, Keidansky Gambit has a 57.4% (90% CI: 57.1%-57.7%) win rate for White overall, with a 2.9% draw rate and 39.7% loss rate. This is based on 68K games from Lichess.
What is the best rating to play the Bishop's Opening: Urusov Gambit, Keidansky Gambit?
The Bishop's Opening: Urusov Gambit, Keidansky Gambit performs best at 2200-2499, where White has a minimum advantage of +22.6%. This means we're 90% confident White wins at least 22.6 percentage points more than they lose at this rating.
Is the Bishop's Opening: Urusov Gambit, Keidansky Gambit better in blitz or rapid?
Blitz (+18.8% edge) outperforms Classical (+6.9% edge) by 11.9 percentage points. Faster time controls typically favor gambits because opponents have less time to find accurate defenses.
Does the Bishop's Opening: Urusov Gambit, Keidansky Gambit breakpoint vary by time control?
Yes, significantly. Breakpoints by time control: Bullet: Never, Blitz: Never, Rapid: Never, Classical: 1200-1399. "Never" means the gambit remains viable through all rating brackets in that time control. Faster time controls typically extend viability.
How sharp is the Bishop's Opening: Urusov Gambit, Keidansky Gambit?
The Bishop's Opening: Urusov Gambit, Keidansky Gambit is extremely sharp with only 2.9% draws—97.1% of games end decisively. This makes it an excellent choice when you need to play for a win rather than accept a draw.
Should I play the Bishop's Opening: Urusov Gambit, Keidansky Gambit?
The Bishop's Opening: Urusov Gambit, Keidansky Gambit is viable at all rating levels in Lichess data. White maintains a statistical edge throughout. It's an excellent choice if you enjoy sharp, initiative-based play.
How do I defend against the Bishop's Opening: Urusov Gambit, Keidansky Gambit?
The Bishop's Opening: Urusov Gambit, Keidansky Gambit is statistically challenging to defend at all levels. As Black, focus on quick development, early castling, and piece trades. Don't get greedy with extra material. Consider declining the gambit or finding a transposition if you're uncomfortable with sharp positions.
How reliable is the Bishop's Opening: Urusov Gambit, Keidansky Gambit data?
This analysis is based on 68K games from Lichess. All statistics include 90% confidence intervals. Generally, 300+ games provide statistically meaningful results. Rating-specific and time-control-specific breakdowns have their own sample sizes shown in the table above.