Skip to content
TrueEloPlay what wins.
Score a position

Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit

312K games from Lichess · Updated January 2026

No move sequence recorded for this opening

White expected score · All ratings · All speeds

53.1%

45%60%
Floor53.0%

the worst score you would still get, 90% confident. At best 53.3%.

Measured over 312K games at this level and clock.

Play Thiswins clearly more often than it loses at this level

A strong choice for White at this level and clock.

Outcomes for White

Draw 3.1 · Score = win + ½ of the draws · 312K games

Rank among the families White can choose here
not ranked — this is a variation, not a family
Games in this context
312K
Best context
59.0% at 2000-2199 Rapid
Worst context
49.8% at 0-999 Bullet
Average game length
31 moves
Games that end decisively
96.9%
Draws
3.1%

Best and worst are the strongest and weakest squares with at least 500 games behind them. The table further down shows every square, including thinner ones.

Extra Analysis

Deep-dive datasets for this opening

Where it holds · White score by rating × clock

Green is clearly ahead for White, grey is around even, red is behind. Tap a cell to measure there, and again to clear. It gets better as the rating rises: 53.7% at 0-999, 73.8% at 2500+.

RatingUBBulleBlitzRapidClass
0-999
1000-1199
1200-1399
1400-1599
1600-1799
1800-1999
2000-2199
2200-2499
2500+

Expected score matrix by rating bracket and time control

  • 0-999 rating, UltraBullet: 48.0% expected score (23 games)
  • 0-999 rating, Bullet: 49.8% expected score (5,134 games)
  • 0-999 rating, Blitz: 53.6% expected score (4,808 games)
  • 0-999 rating, Rapid: 56.1% expected score (1,886 games)
  • 0-999 rating, Classical: 61.2% expected score (12 games)
  • 1000-1199 rating, UltraBullet: 41.4% expected score (39 games)
  • 1000-1199 rating, Bullet: 50.9% expected score (12,307 games)
  • 1000-1199 rating, Blitz: 54.6% expected score (11,472 games)
  • 1000-1199 rating, Rapid: 57.3% expected score (3,151 games)
  • 1000-1199 rating, Classical: 47.7% expected score (42 games)
  • 1200-1399 rating, UltraBullet: 46.6% expected score (71 games)
  • 1200-1399 rating, Bullet: 50.9% expected score (20,167 games)
  • 1200-1399 rating, Blitz: 54.3% expected score (23,153 games)
  • 1200-1399 rating, Rapid: 56.5% expected score (5,308 games)
  • 1200-1399 rating, Classical: 68.2% expected score (120 games)
  • 1400-1599 rating, UltraBullet: 61.4% expected score (60 games)
  • 1400-1599 rating, Bullet: 50.4% expected score (26,361 games)
  • 1400-1599 rating, Blitz: 53.8% expected score (34,493 games)
  • 1400-1599 rating, Rapid: 55.4% expected score (7,645 games)
  • 1400-1599 rating, Classical: 57.2% expected score (229 games)
  • 1600-1799 rating, UltraBullet: 50.0% expected score (20 games)
  • 1600-1799 rating, Bullet: 50.7% expected score (26,544 games)
  • 1600-1799 rating, Blitz: 54.0% expected score (35,741 games)
  • 1600-1799 rating, Rapid: 56.2% expected score (7,636 games)
  • 1600-1799 rating, Classical: 66.2% expected score (175 games)
  • 1800-1999 rating, UltraBullet: 61.2% expected score (12 games)
  • 1800-1999 rating, Bullet: 51.5% expected score (19,295 games)
  • 1800-1999 rating, Blitz: 53.8% expected score (26,955 games)
  • 1800-1999 rating, Rapid: 56.8% expected score (4,373 games)
  • 1800-1999 rating, Classical: 59.0% expected score (93 games)
  • 2000-2199 rating, UltraBullet: 60.6% expected score (8 games)
  • 2000-2199 rating, Bullet: 51.0% expected score (12,249 games)
  • 2000-2199 rating, Blitz: 55.4% expected score (10,362 games)
  • 2000-2199 rating, Rapid: 59.0% expected score (1,187 games)
  • 2000-2199 rating, Classical: 58.7% expected score (10 games)
  • 2200-2499 rating, UltraBullet: 23.4% expected score (6 games)
  • 2200-2499 rating, Bullet: 53.9% expected score (6,762 games)
  • 2200-2499 rating, Blitz: 55.1% expected score (2,946 games)
  • 2200-2499 rating, Rapid: 63.2% expected score (116 games)
  • 2500+ rating, Bullet: 58.9% expected score (1,030 games)
  • 2500+ rating, Blitz: 71.0% expected score (89 games)
  • 2500+ rating, Rapid: 91.4% expected score (13 games)

Related Openings

Methodology

Across every rating and clock, the Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit scores 53.1% for White — we are 90% confident the real figure is between 53.0% and 53.3% — from 312K Lichess games. Win rate, draw rate and loss rate come from games played December 2023 to November 2025.

How the figures are made
Whose games these are
312K+ rated games played on Lichess (2023-12 to 2025-11). The games are Lichess’s and free for anyone to use. What is ours is the reading of them. Last rebuilt January 2026.
Which games we count
  • Rated games only — nothing casual.
  • Both players within 200 rating points of each other. A mismatch tells you about the gap, not about the opening.
  • At least 2 moves played.
  • A game is filed under White’s rating.
Why every number comes with a range
A number off a few hundred games is a guess. The same number off millions is a fact. The range is what tells them apart, and it is what the lists rank on — so an opening cannot reach the top on a lucky run of forty games. The more games behind a figure, the narrower its range.
How much we need before we say anything
An opening page needs 100 games. A gambit needs 50 games at a rating before we will say whether it pays there. The chaos and trap lists need 500 games overall and 250 games at one rating or clock.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit win rate?

Playing the Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit, White wins 51.5%, draws 3.1% and loses 45.4%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 53.1%. It rests on 312K rated games from Lichess.

At what rating does the Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit perform best?

The Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit performs best for White at 2500+, with an Expected Score of 60.3% (1.1K games) and the highest Floor of any rating with enough games to read.

Is the Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit better in blitz or rapid?

For White, the Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit scores higher in Rapid: an Expected Score of 54.2% in Blitz (150K games) against 56.4% in Rapid (31K games).

How sharp is the Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit?

The Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit has a sharpness score of 96.9 (very decisive), meaning 96.9% of games end decisively. Average game length is 31 moves.

What is the Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit win rate at 0-999?

At 0-999, White wins 50.9%, draws 3.0% and loses 46.2%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 52.4%. It rests on 12K Lichess games, which average 25 moves.

What is the Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit win rate at 1000-1199?

At 1000-1199, White wins 52.0%, draws 2.4% and loses 45.6%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 53.2%. It rests on 27K Lichess games, which average 27 moves.

What is the Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit win rate at 1200-1399?

At 1200-1399, White wins 51.9%, draws 2.5% and loses 45.6%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 53.2%. It rests on 49K Lichess games, which average 29 moves.

What is the Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit win rate at 1400-1599?

At 1400-1599, White wins 51.3%, draws 2.7% and loses 45.9%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 52.7%. It rests on 69K Lichess games, which average 31 moves.

What is the Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit win rate at 1600-1799?

At 1600-1799, White wins 51.4%, draws 3.2% and loses 45.4%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 53.0%. It rests on 70K Lichess games, which average 32 moves.

What is the Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit win rate at 1800-1999?

At 1800-1999, White wins 51.3%, draws 3.7% and loses 45.0%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 53.2%. It rests on 51K Lichess games, which average 34 moves.

What is the Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit win rate at 2000-2199?

At 2000-2199, White wins 51.3%, draws 4.0% and loses 44.7%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 53.3%. It rests on 24K Lichess games, which average 35 moves.

What is the Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit win rate at 2200-2499?

At 2200-2499, White wins 52.1%, draws 4.6% and loses 43.4%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 54.4%. It rests on 9.8K Lichess games, which average 37 moves.

What is the Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit win rate at 2500+?

At 2500+, White wins 57.7%, draws 5.1% and loses 37.2%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 60.3%. It rests on 1.1K Lichess games, which average 42 moves.

What is the Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit win rate in UltraBullet?

In UltraBullet, White wins 50.1%, draws 0.6% and loses 49.3%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 50.4%. It rests on 239 Lichess games.

What is the Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit win rate in Bullet?

In Bullet, White wins 49.9%, draws 2.2% and loses 47.9%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 51.0%. It rests on 130K Lichess games.

What is the Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit win rate in Blitz?

In Blitz, White wins 52.3%, draws 3.7% and loses 44.0%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 54.2%. It rests on 150K Lichess games.

What is the Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit win rate in Rapid?

In Rapid, White wins 54.4%, draws 4.0% and loses 41.6%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 56.4%. It rests on 31K Lichess games.

What is the Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit win rate in Classical?

In Classical, White wins 59.6%, draws 3.4% and loses 37.0%. Counting a draw as half a point, that is an Expected Score of 61.3%. It rests on 681 Lichess games.

Is the Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit a good opening?

The Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit is good for White. Across all ratings, White wins 51.5% of its games and loses 45.4%. It performs best at 2500+. Your results depend on your rating, time control, and how well you know the typical plans.