Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation

42K games from Lichess · Updated January 2026

Playable
White Expected Score48.8%Range (90% confident): 48.4% – 49.2%Based on 42K games
0%48.8%100%
Range (90% confident): 48.4% – 49.2%
Outcome Distribution
47.6%2.3%50.0%
Win
Draw
Loss
4...d5
Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation
Analyzen=42K
Avg Length27 moves
Sharpness98%
Draw Rate2.3%

What is the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation expected score for White?

Snapshot

At all ratings, the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation has a 48.8% expected score for White (we're 90% confident it's between 48.4% and 49.2%), based on 42K Lichess games.

Extra Analysis

Deep-dive datasets for this opening

White Win% by Rating

Stable across ratings (~46%)

0
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
2200
2500+

  • 0-999: 46.0% win rate (1,620 games)
  • 1000-1199: 46.7% win rate (3,818 games)
  • 1200-1399: 48.0% win rate (6,062 games)
  • 1400-1599: 49.7% win rate (7,165 games)
  • 1600-1799: 48.8% win rate (8,406 games)
  • 1800-1999: 46.9% win rate (8,093 games)
  • 2000-2199: 46.0% win rate (4,802 games)
  • 2200-2499: 44.2% win rate (1,761 games)
  • 2500+: 44.5% win rate (202 games)

White Win% by Time Control

Best in UltraBullet (53%), worst in Bullet (45%)

UltraBullet
Bullet
Blitz
Rapid
Classical

  • UltraBullet: 53.0% win rate (260 games)
  • Bullet: 45.2% win rate (21,007 games)
  • Blitz: 49.5% win rate (16,563 games)
  • Rapid: 52.6% win rate (3,966 games)
  • Classical: 46.5% win rate (133 games)

White% by Rating × Time Control

Click any cell to filter. Green = above 50%, Red = below 50%.

RatingUBBulleBlitzRapidClass
0-999
1000-1199
1200-1399
1400-1599
1600-1799
1800-1999
2000-2199
2200-2499
2500+

Expected score matrix by rating bracket and time control

  • 0-999 rating, UltraBullet: 30.0% expected score (1 games)
  • 0-999 rating, Bullet: 49.5% expected score (538 games)
  • 0-999 rating, Blitz: 44.1% expected score (753 games)
  • 0-999 rating, Rapid: 50.8% expected score (326 games)
  • 0-999 rating, Classical: 50.0% expected score (2 games)
  • 1000-1199 rating, UltraBullet: 54.8% expected score (9 games)
  • 1000-1199 rating, Bullet: 42.7% expected score (1,571 games)
  • 1000-1199 rating, Blitz: 50.3% expected score (1,652 games)
  • 1000-1199 rating, Rapid: 52.3% expected score (582 games)
  • 1000-1199 rating, Classical: 68.2% expected score (4 games)
  • 1200-1399 rating, UltraBullet: 50.0% expected score (28 games)
  • 1200-1399 rating, Bullet: 45.1% expected score (2,631 games)
  • 1200-1399 rating, Blitz: 51.4% expected score (2,544 games)
  • 1200-1399 rating, Rapid: 53.0% expected score (837 games)
  • 1200-1399 rating, Classical: 50.0% expected score (22 games)
  • 1400-1599 rating, UltraBullet: 50.7% expected score (136 games)
  • 1400-1599 rating, Bullet: 47.8% expected score (2,909 games)
  • 1400-1599 rating, Blitz: 52.3% expected score (3,236 games)
  • 1400-1599 rating, Rapid: 55.6% expected score (847 games)
  • 1400-1599 rating, Classical: 46.2% expected score (37 games)
  • 1600-1799 rating, UltraBullet: 64.3% expected score (51 games)
  • 1600-1799 rating, Bullet: 46.5% expected score (4,033 games)
  • 1600-1799 rating, Blitz: 52.4% expected score (3,592 games)
  • 1600-1799 rating, Rapid: 58.3% expected score (685 games)
  • 1600-1799 rating, Classical: 45.7% expected score (45 games)
  • 1800-1999 rating, UltraBullet: 60.4% expected score (13 games)
  • 1800-1999 rating, Bullet: 45.8% expected score (4,539 games)
  • 1800-1999 rating, Blitz: 51.0% expected score (3,039 games)
  • 1800-1999 rating, Rapid: 52.7% expected score (487 games)
  • 1800-1999 rating, Classical: 44.0% expected score (15 games)
  • 2000-2199 rating, UltraBullet: 39.5% expected score (8 games)
  • 2000-2199 rating, Bullet: 47.0% expected score (3,208 games)
  • 2000-2199 rating, Blitz: 48.1% expected score (1,403 games)
  • 2000-2199 rating, Rapid: 50.3% expected score (175 games)
  • 2000-2199 rating, Classical: 50.0% expected score (8 games)
  • 2200-2499 rating, UltraBullet: 43.6% expected score (14 games)
  • 2200-2499 rating, Bullet: 46.3% expected score (1,402 games)
  • 2200-2499 rating, Blitz: 43.6% expected score (319 games)
  • 2200-2499 rating, Rapid: 55.5% expected score (26 games)
  • 2500+ rating, Bullet: 45.3% expected score (176 games)
  • 2500+ rating, Blitz: 63.3% expected score (25 games)
  • 2500+ rating, Rapid: 30.0% expected score (1 games)

Related Openings

Analyze Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation PositionsGet move-by-move win rates with the TrueElo analyzer

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation win rate?

The Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation has a 47.6% (90% CI: 47.2%-48.0%) win rate for white, based on 42K rated games from Lichess.

At what rating does the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation perform best?

The Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation performs best at 1400-1599 Elo with a 49.7% win rate for white (7.2K games). Win rate tends to decline at higher ratings as opponents know the theory better.

Is the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation better in blitz or rapid?

Rapid (52.6%) outperforms Classical (46.5%) by 6.1%. Choose your time control wisely.

How sharp is the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation?

The Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation has a sharpness score of 97.7 (very decisive), meaning 97.7% of games end decisively. Average game length is 27 moves.

What is the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation win rate at 0-999 Elo?

At 0-999 Elo, the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation has a 46.0% (90% CI: 44.0%-48.1%) win rate for white, based on 1.6K Lichess games. Average game length is 22 moves with a 2.4% draw rate.

What is the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation win rate at 1000-1199 Elo?

At 1000-1199 Elo, the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation has a 46.7% (90% CI: 45.3%-48.0%) win rate for white, based on 3.8K Lichess games. Average game length is 23 moves with a 1.6% draw rate.

What is the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation win rate at 1200-1399 Elo?

At 1200-1399 Elo, the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation has a 48.0% (90% CI: 47.0%-49.1%) win rate for white, based on 6.1K Lichess games. Average game length is 25 moves with a 1.6% draw rate.

What is the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation win rate at 1400-1599 Elo?

At 1400-1599 Elo, the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation has a 49.7% (90% CI: 48.7%-50.7%) win rate for white, based on 7.2K Lichess games. Average game length is 26 moves with a 2.2% draw rate.

What is the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation win rate at 1600-1799 Elo?

At 1600-1799 Elo, the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation has a 48.8% (90% CI: 47.9%-49.7%) win rate for white, based on 8.4K Lichess games. Average game length is 28 moves with a 2.5% draw rate.

What is the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation win rate at 1800-1999 Elo?

At 1800-1999 Elo, the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation has a 46.9% (90% CI: 46.0%-47.8%) win rate for white, based on 8.1K Lichess games. Average game length is 30 moves with a 2.5% draw rate.

What is the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation win rate at 2000-2199 Elo?

At 2000-2199 Elo, the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation has a 46.0% (90% CI: 44.8%-47.1%) win rate for white, based on 4.8K Lichess games. Average game length is 31 moves with a 2.9% draw rate.

What is the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation win rate at 2200-2499 Elo?

At 2200-2499 Elo, the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation has a 44.2% (90% CI: 42.3%-46.2%) win rate for white, based on 1.8K Lichess games. Average game length is 33 moves with a 3.4% draw rate.

What is the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation win rate at 2500+ Elo?

At 2500+ Elo, the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation has a 44.5% (90% CI: 38.8%-50.2%) win rate for white, based on 202 Lichess games. Average game length is 36 moves with a 5.7% draw rate.

What is the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation win rate in UltraBullet?

In UltraBullet games, the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation has a 53.0% (90% CI: 47.9%-58.0%) win rate for white (260 Lichess games). Draw rate is 0.2%.

What is the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation win rate in Bullet?

In Bullet games, the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation has a 45.2% (90% CI: 44.6%-45.8%) win rate for white (21K Lichess games). Draw rate is 1.9%.

What is the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation win rate in Blitz?

In Blitz games, the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation has a 49.5% (90% CI: 48.8%-50.1%) win rate for white (17K Lichess games). Draw rate is 2.7%.

What is the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation win rate in Rapid?

In Rapid games, the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation has a 52.6% (90% CI: 51.3%-53.9%) win rate for white (4.0K Lichess games). Draw rate is 2.9%.

What is the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation win rate in Classical?

In Classical games, the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation has a 46.5% (90% CI: 39.4%-53.5%) win rate for white (133 Lichess games). Draw rate is 1.9%.

Is the Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation a good opening?

The Latvian Gambit: Mayet Attack, Polerio-Svedenborg Variation is statistically balanced with a 47.6% (90% CI: 47.2%-48.0%) win rate across all ratings. It performs best at 1400-1599 Elo. Your results depend on your rating, time control, and how well you know the typical plans.