Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Taimanov Gambit

White Gambit

Source Lichess

Play This+10%
All Ratings
Minimum Advantage+9.6%

White wins at least 9.6% more often than loses

Rating TrendPeak: +7.6% at 2500+
Win%54.4%
Games1.4K
Breakpoint (Overall)Never
8.Nd4
Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Taimanov GambitWhite Gambit
Rating
Time Control

Does Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Taimanov Gambit work for White at All Ratings?

Snapshot

At All Ratings, Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Taimanov Gambit gives White a +9.6% minimum advantage (90% confidence). This gambit is effective.

RatingMin AdvWhite WinDrawWhite LossGames
2000-2199+4.5%56.6%2.6%40.8%208
2200-2499+5.3%52.7%6.6%40.7%580
2500++7.6%55.0%4.2%40.8%627
Full Opening StatsSee rating/time-control breakdowns for White on the opening stats page
Analyze Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Taimanov Gambit PositionsGet move-by-move win rates with the TrueElo analyzer

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Taimanov Gambit sound?

The Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Taimanov Gambit has no overall breakpoint in Lichess data, meaning White wins more than loses even at the highest rating brackets across all time controls. This is a statistically sound gambit at all levels analyzed.

What is the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Taimanov Gambit win rate?

The Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Taimanov Gambit has a 54.4% (90% CI: 52.3%-56.6%) win rate for White overall, with a 4.9% draw rate and 40.6% loss rate. This is based on 1.4K games from Lichess.

What is the best rating to play the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Taimanov Gambit?

The Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Taimanov Gambit performs best at 2500+, where White has a minimum advantage of +7.6%. This means we're 90% confident White wins at least 7.6 percentage points more than they lose at this rating.

Is the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Taimanov Gambit better in blitz or rapid?

Blitz (+9.1% edge) outperforms Bullet (+6.7% edge) by 2.4 percentage points. Faster time controls typically favor gambits because opponents have less time to find accurate defenses.

Does the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Taimanov Gambit breakpoint vary by time control?

Yes, significantly. Breakpoints by time control: Bullet: Never, Blitz: 2000-2199, Rapid: Never, Classical: Never. "Never" means the gambit remains viable through all rating brackets in that time control. Faster time controls typically extend viability.

How sharp is the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Taimanov Gambit?

The Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Taimanov Gambit is extremely sharp with only 4.9% draws—95.1% of games end decisively. This makes it an excellent choice when you need to play for a win rather than accept a draw.

Should I play the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Taimanov Gambit?

The Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Taimanov Gambit is viable at all rating levels in Lichess data. White maintains a statistical edge throughout. It's an excellent choice if you enjoy sharp, initiative-based play.

How do I defend against the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Taimanov Gambit?

The Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Taimanov Gambit is statistically challenging to defend at all levels. As Black, focus on quick development, early castling, and piece trades. Don't get greedy with extra material. Consider declining the gambit or finding a transposition if you're uncomfortable with sharp positions.

How reliable is the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Taimanov Gambit data?

This analysis is based on 1.4K games from Lichess. All statistics include 90% confidence intervals. Generally, 300+ games provide statistically meaningful results. Rating-specific and time-control-specific breakdowns have their own sample sizes shown in the table above.