Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System

White Gambit

Source Lichess

Play This+9%
All Ratings
Minimum Advantage+9.1%

White wins at least 9.1% more often than loses

Rating TrendPeak: +10.6% at 1400-1599
Win%52.6%
Games391K
Breakpoint (Overall)Never
4...e6
Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional SystemWhite Gambit
Rating
Time Control

Does Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System work for White at All Ratings?

Snapshot

At All Ratings, Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System gives White a +9.1% minimum advantage (90% confidence). This gambit is effective.

RatingMin AdvWhite WinDrawWhite LossGames
0-999+8.4%54.0%2.4%43.7%7.1K
1000-1199+10.1%54.2%2.9%42.9%19K
1200-1399+10.2%54.0%2.9%43.0%41K
1400-1599+10.6%53.9%3.3%42.7%71K
1600-1799+8.6%52.7%3.7%43.6%95K
1800-1999+7.3%51.7%4.5%43.8%80K
2000-2199+7.1%51.5%4.9%43.6%45K
2200-2499+5.8%50.1%6.6%43.3%25K
2500++7.7%50.7%8.4%40.9%6.0K
Full Opening StatsSee rating/time-control breakdowns for White on the opening stats page
Analyze Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System PositionsGet move-by-move win rates with the TrueElo analyzer

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System sound?

The Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System has no overall breakpoint in Lichess data, meaning White wins more than loses even at the highest rating brackets across all time controls. This is a statistically sound gambit at all levels analyzed.

What is the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System win rate?

The Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System has a 52.6% (90% CI: 52.5%-52.8%) win rate for White overall, with a 4.1% draw rate and 43.3% loss rate. This is based on 391K games from Lichess.

What is the best rating to play the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System?

The Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System performs best at 1400-1599, where White has a minimum advantage of +10.6%. This means we're 90% confident White wins at least 10.6 percentage points more than they lose at this rating.

Is the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System better in blitz or rapid?

Classical (+16.4% edge) outperforms UltraBullet (+3.4% edge) by 13.0 percentage points. Faster time controls typically favor gambits because opponents have less time to find accurate defenses.

Does the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System breakpoint vary by time control?

Yes, significantly. Breakpoints by time control: Bullet: Never, Blitz: Never, Rapid: 2500+, Classical: 2000-2199. "Never" means the gambit remains viable through all rating brackets in that time control. Faster time controls typically extend viability.

How sharp is the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System?

The Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System is extremely sharp with only 4.1% draws—95.9% of games end decisively. This makes it an excellent choice when you need to play for a win rather than accept a draw.

Should I play the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System?

The Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System is viable at all rating levels in Lichess data. White maintains a statistical edge throughout. It's an excellent choice if you enjoy sharp, initiative-based play.

How do I defend against the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System?

The Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System is statistically challenging to defend at all levels. As Black, focus on quick development, early castling, and piece trades. Don't get greedy with extra material. Consider declining the gambit or finding a transposition if you're uncomfortable with sharp positions.

How reliable is the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System data?

This analysis is based on 391K games from Lichess. All statistics include 90% confidence intervals. Generally, 300+ games provide statistically meaningful results. Rating-specific and time-control-specific breakdowns have their own sample sizes shown in the table above.