Dutch Defense: Manhattan Gambit, Anti-Leningrad

White Gambit

Source Lichess

Play This+4%
All Ratings
Minimum Advantage+4.4%

White wins at least 4.4% more often than loses

Rating TrendPeak: -0.5% at 1800-1999
Win%53.0%
Games1.1K
Breakpoint (Overall)1400-1599
3.g4
Dutch Defense: Manhattan Gambit, Anti-LeningradWhite Gambit
Rating
Time Control

Does Dutch Defense: Manhattan Gambit, Anti-Leningrad work for White at All Ratings?

Snapshot

At All Ratings, Dutch Defense: Manhattan Gambit, Anti-Leningrad gives White a +4.4% minimum advantage (90% confidence). This gambit is effective.

RatingMin AdvWhite WinDrawWhite LossGames
1400-1599-8.4%54.5%0.6%44.9%82
1600-1799-6.7%51.4%3.3%45.3%165
1800-1999-0.5%53.2%2.3%44.5%323
2000-2199-3.6%50.8%3.8%45.4%330
2200-2499-3.2%51.5%7.2%41.3%145
Full Opening StatsSee rating/time-control breakdowns for White on the opening stats page
Analyze Dutch Defense: Manhattan Gambit, Anti-Leningrad PositionsGet move-by-move win rates with the TrueElo analyzer

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Dutch Defense: Manhattan Gambit, Anti-Leningrad sound?

The Dutch Defense: Manhattan Gambit, Anti-Leningrad breaks at 1400-1599 overall (all time controls)—the first rating bracket where White no longer statistically wins more than loses. Below this rating, the gambit is viable for White. Note: breakpoints vary by time control—use the filters above for specific data.

What is the Dutch Defense: Manhattan Gambit, Anti-Leningrad win rate?

The Dutch Defense: Manhattan Gambit, Anti-Leningrad has a 53.0% (90% CI: 50.5%-55.4%) win rate for White overall, with a 3.3% draw rate and 43.7% loss rate. This is based on 1.1K games from Lichess.

What is the best rating to play the Dutch Defense: Manhattan Gambit, Anti-Leningrad?

The Dutch Defense: Manhattan Gambit, Anti-Leningrad performs best at 1800-1999, where White has a minimum advantage of +-0.5%. This means we're 90% confident White wins at least -0.5 percentage points more than they lose at this rating.

Is the Dutch Defense: Manhattan Gambit, Anti-Leningrad better in blitz or rapid?

Bullet (+3.1% edge) outperforms Rapid (+-2.7% edge) by 5.8 percentage points. Faster time controls typically favor gambits because opponents have less time to find accurate defenses.

Does the Dutch Defense: Manhattan Gambit, Anti-Leningrad breakpoint vary by time control?

Yes, significantly. Breakpoints by time control: Bullet: 1800-1999, Blitz: 1400-1599, Rapid: Never, Classical: Never. "Never" means the gambit remains viable through all rating brackets in that time control. Faster time controls typically extend viability.

How sharp is the Dutch Defense: Manhattan Gambit, Anti-Leningrad?

The Dutch Defense: Manhattan Gambit, Anti-Leningrad is extremely sharp with only 3.3% draws—96.7% of games end decisively. This makes it an excellent choice when you need to play for a win rather than accept a draw.

Should I play the Dutch Defense: Manhattan Gambit, Anti-Leningrad?

If you're below 1400-1599 overall, the Dutch Defense: Manhattan Gambit, Anti-Leningrad is statistically favorable for White. Above that rating, opponents defend better and the gambit's edge disappears. Consider your typical opponents' level and the time control—faster games extend the gambit's viability.

How do I defend against the Dutch Defense: Manhattan Gambit, Anti-Leningrad?

As Black, the Dutch Defense: Manhattan Gambit, Anti-Leningrad becomes easier to defend at 1400-1599 and above. Key principles: accept the material but develop quickly, castle early, trade pieces to reduce attacking potential, and return material at the right moment to neutralize the initiative. In faster time controls, the gambit is harder to defend—consider declining or transposing if you're not prepared.

How reliable is the Dutch Defense: Manhattan Gambit, Anti-Leningrad data?

This analysis is based on 1.1K games from Lichess. All statistics include 90% confidence intervals. Generally, 300+ games provide statistically meaningful results. Rating-specific and time-control-specific breakdowns have their own sample sizes shown in the table above.