Rapport-Jobava System, with e6

1 variations · 2.4M games from Lichess · Updated January 2026

Key Finding

Rapport-Jobava System, with e6 gives White a 52.4% expected score — a strong opening choice.

With a minimum advantage of 4.7%, this opening reliably outperforms the baseline 50% expected score.

You play

Play This

Rating

Time

White Expected Score0.0%Range (90% confident): 52.4% – 52.5%Aggregated from 1 variations

0%52.4%100%

Range (90% confident): 52.4% – 52.5%

ContextOverall · n=2.4M

Outcome Distribution

50.5%3.7%45.7%

Win

Draw

Loss

3.Bf4

Rapport-Jobava System, with e6

Variations1

Games (Context)2.4M

Avg Length33 moves

Draw Rate3.7%

What Should I Play?

Player-controlled continuations for White · Overall

#1Rapport-Jobava System, with e6Top Pick

1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 e6 3.Bf4

Min adv +4.7% · n=2.4M

52.4%

Continuations show the most common variations from this opening. Higher expected scores indicate better statistical outcomes, but familiarity and playstyle matter too.

Snapshot

Overall, the Rapport-Jobava System, with e6 family has a 52.4% expected score for White (we're 90% confident it's between 52.4% and 52.5%), aggregated from 1 variations and 2.4M Lichess games.

White Win% by Rating

Improves with rating: 50% → 53%

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

2200

2500+

White Win% by Time Control

Best in UltraBullet (55%), worst in Blitz (50%)

UltraBullet

Bullet

Blitz

Rapid

Classical

Rating vs Time Control Matrix

Click cells to filter · White expected scores

White% by Rating × Time Control

Click any cell to filter. Green = above 50%, Red = below 50%.

Rating	UB	Bulle	Blitz	Rapid	Class
0-999
1000-1199
1200-1399
1400-1599
1600-1799
1800-1999
2000-2199
2200-2499
2500+					—

Expected score matrix by rating bracket and time control

0-999 rating, UltraBullet: 51.9% expected score (108 games)
0-999 rating, Bullet: 51.4% expected score (34,508 games)
0-999 rating, Blitz: 52.0% expected score (75,189 games)
0-999 rating, Rapid: 53.2% expected score (29,872 games)
0-999 rating, Classical: 50.0% expected score (158 games)
1000-1199 rating, UltraBullet: 54.9% expected score (236 games)
1000-1199 rating, Bullet: 52.5% expected score (80,648 games)
1000-1199 rating, Blitz: 52.6% expected score (150,900 games)
1000-1199 rating, Rapid: 53.5% expected score (55,651 games)
1000-1199 rating, Classical: 53.5% expected score (804 games)
1200-1399 rating, UltraBullet: 54.2% expected score (622 games)
1200-1399 rating, Bullet: 52.0% expected score (114,194 games)
1200-1399 rating, Blitz: 52.3% expected score (238,282 games)
1200-1399 rating, Rapid: 53.1% expected score (78,909 games)
1200-1399 rating, Classical: 53.1% expected score (2,229 games)
1400-1599 rating, UltraBullet: 53.1% expected score (805 games)
1400-1599 rating, Bullet: 52.1% expected score (138,668 games)
1400-1599 rating, Blitz: 52.1% expected score (265,594 games)
1400-1599 rating, Rapid: 52.2% expected score (94,248 games)
1400-1599 rating, Classical: 52.7% expected score (3,878 games)
1600-1799 rating, UltraBullet: 58.3% expected score (521 games)
1600-1799 rating, Bullet: 52.4% expected score (140,893 games)
1600-1799 rating, Blitz: 51.9% expected score (239,225 games)
1600-1799 rating, Rapid: 52.4% expected score (75,489 games)
1600-1799 rating, Classical: 53.0% expected score (2,873 games)
1800-1999 rating, UltraBullet: 60.9% expected score (306 games)
1800-1999 rating, Bullet: 52.6% expected score (112,385 games)
1800-1999 rating, Blitz: 52.5% expected score (150,044 games)
1800-1999 rating, Rapid: 52.3% expected score (43,019 games)
1800-1999 rating, Classical: 56.5% expected score (1,581 games)
2000-2199 rating, UltraBullet: 54.4% expected score (67 games)
2000-2199 rating, Bullet: 53.1% expected score (71,348 games)
2000-2199 rating, Blitz: 52.9% expected score (68,408 games)
2000-2199 rating, Rapid: 54.6% expected score (15,275 games)
2000-2199 rating, Classical: 56.1% expected score (254 games)
2200-2499 rating, UltraBullet: 59.0% expected score (49 games)
2200-2499 rating, Bullet: 53.1% expected score (41,505 games)
2200-2499 rating, Blitz: 54.4% expected score (23,399 games)
2200-2499 rating, Rapid: 55.6% expected score (2,534 games)
2200-2499 rating, Classical: 62.7% expected score (34 games)
2500+ rating, UltraBullet: 50.0% expected score (2 games)
2500+ rating, Bullet: 55.4% expected score (12,056 games)
2500+ rating, Blitz: 56.9% expected score (2,344 games)
2500+ rating, Rapid: 64.7% expected score (36 games)

Matrix view reveals how performance varies across rating brackets and time controls. Green indicates favorable, red indicates challenging contexts.

Variations (1)

Rapport-Jobava System, with e62.4M games

Winning52.4%

Analyze Rapport-Jobava System, with e6 PositionsGet move-by-move win rates with the TrueElo analyzer

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Rapport-Jobava System, with e6 win rate?

The Rapport-Jobava System, with e6 family has a 50.5% (90% CI: 50.5%-50.6%) win rate for white, aggregated from 1 variations and 2.4M rated games from Lichess.

How many Rapport-Jobava System, with e6 variations are there?

This analysis covers 1 Rapport-Jobava System, with e6 variations with sufficient game data. Each variation has its own statistics page with detailed win rates by rating and time control.

At what rating does the Rapport-Jobava System, with e6 perform best?

The Rapport-Jobava System, with e6 family performs best at 2500+ Elo with a 52.6% win rate for white (14K games). Performance may vary by specific variation.

Is the Rapport-Jobava System, with e6 better in blitz or rapid?

UltraBullet (54.8%) outperforms Classical (50.8%) by 4.0% across all Rapport-Jobava System, with e6 variations.

How sharp is the Rapport-Jobava System, with e6?

Rapport-Jobava System, with e6 games are 96.3% decisive (non-draws), with an average length of 33 moves. Sharpness varies by specific variation.

Is the Rapport-Jobava System, with e6 a good opening family?

The Rapport-Jobava System, with e6 family is statistically favors white overall with a 50.5% (90% CI: 50.5%-50.6%) aggregated win rate. However, win rates vary significantly between the 1 variations—explore individual lines to find the best fit for your style.